Harness audit vs copying a full agent stack

A harness audit checks what your repo already has — docs, checks, loops — and adds only the missing pieces. Copying a full agent stack drops someone else’s tools, hooks, and opinions on top. Use diy-harness when you want readiness, not a second operating system.

Which one should you use?

A harness audit checks what your repo already has — docs, checks, loops — and adds only the missing pieces. Copying a full agent stack drops someone else’s tools, hooks, and opinions on top. Use diy-harness when you want readiness, not a second operating system.

Side by side.

OptionWhat it doesWhere it runsBest for
diy-harness skillAudit, then fill gapsA repo you already ownYou want the smallest missing layer
Copy a full stackClone another team’s agent kitGreenfield or “make it like theirs”You intend to adopt that whole system

When an audit is enough.

You have a working product. You need agents to stop rediscovering the same rules. Audit first.

When a full stack is honest.

You are starting empty and you want that specific kit. Then copy on purpose — do not pretend it was an audit.